November 6, 2011
Angel Cvetkov
Western practices to Eastern Enlightenment
Abstract:
During big part of the 20th century, and especially after WW2, with the rise of the bit era and the counter-culture, the secular, post-christian West has been seing Eastern spirituality with romanticized eyes, and has tried to incorporate some of its tennets within its worldview. Almost every child today knows what Yoga is and the numbers of Buddhist practitioners in the West has been quietly increasing. Eastern spiritual systems are extremely complex and often difficult to practice in the everyday life, but their "decentralized" nature provided the much needed spiritual inspiration to the post-Christian individualist youth who faced alienation in the growing secular consumerist societies burdened by politics and dry pragmatism.
Enlightenment is a word that has very different connotations in the West and East. In the West, it brings sentiments much in line with Kant's "Dare to think" paradigm, which during the counter-culture movements of the 60ties became ways to challenge the social authorities, Church authorities included. The Eastern idea that the divine resides everywhere and in everything, a.k.a. one omnipowerful non-questionable authority, and that it can be possibly found if one goes on a journey of self-discovery, merged well with the capitalist ideas of individualism and personal freedom of choice. Whether Western concept of individuality is a by-product of capitalist consumerism, is certainly not the point of this presentation.
The idea of personal quest for self-discovery has been as old as mankind, and I would like to present some interesting authentic practices from the West which try, in much of an "Eastern (experiential, non-mentalist way) to "deliver" an answer to some eternal questions like "Who or What am I" etc.
These practices are not divorced from their Eastern connotation, and yet, in many ways they remain fateful to the counter-culture aversion of ultimate authorities.
October 30, 2011
Aleksandar Stamatov
The divination practice and philosophical implications of the Book of Change
Abstract:
The Book of Change (Yi Jing) is an ancient Chinese book that dates around 1100 B.C. It is consisted of sixty-four drawings and because each drawing is consisted of six lines they are also known as hexagrams. The hexagrams are given names and they represent symbols of various things and events in nature. Other than the hexagrams, there is the text that explains each hexagram and additional text that explains each line in a hexagram. In this shape the Book of Change was used for divination and it is still used today.
At the beginning of this speech, I will explain the process of divination. The questioner comes up with a question and by special method one hexagram is picked. The diviner relying on the text comes up with an answer to the question. There are no “Yes” and “No” answers in the Book of Change; the text should be taken symbolically and the diviner interprets the text according to the situation in the question.
Next I will explain the origin of the Book of Change. According to the tradition, there were first invented the eight trigrams, each consisting of three lines. There are two kinds of lines—yin and yang—and when they are combined in a drawing of three horizontal lines, we can come up to eight combinations. Later these trigrams were combined with each other to form the sixty-four hexagrams and the text was added so as to form the Book of Change. Even later other commentaries were added which now are considered as part of the book and represent the philosophical interpretation of the book.
By explaining the origin I will also refer to the philosophical implication of the Book of Change. The main idea is that there is one hidden principle as the origin of all that exists, which function can be seen through the two opposites of the yin and the yang. The world which we can grasp by our experience is subject to constant change, and by understanding this change the human being can form unity with the one principle.
October 23, 2011
Ethan Kegley
"Can Food Be Our Medicine?"
Abstract:
What is medicine? When did we first start using it? What is food? How do these two things relate to the human body? Every day, day in and day out, we eat. We do a plethora of things when we are awake, and many of those specifically relate to food or eating. It has been said by many that “We are what we eat.” This may be truer than most people actively think. Everything that we put into our bodies becomes part of us in a specific way and or for a specific time. This can be good but this can be equally, if not more, terrible. So what about the “food” and “medicine” that each of us grew up on? How did medicine become separated from food? What is our history with the food we have eaten traditionally and how has our food evolved with us? If our food and our culture have evolved together, then why do we have such a disconnection from the food we eat? It is possible that we have lost something in the west, that only now we are beginning to find again. Is it possible that now, in our evolution we have more to learn from the plants we co-exist with than the “medicine” we have been dependent on? I want to relate how the possibility exists to heal ourselves with the food we eat and the environment we put ourselves in. There are many factors that go into being “healthy.” Can food be our medicine for our next step in our evolution?
September 25/2011
Matt Bronsil
Abstract:
Montessori is a Method of Education based primarily on the ideas of Maria Montessori, a female Italian Physician who took a strong interest in child development and education.

Her methods are very different from traditional education.
We will explore what is different, how Montessori got started, how it grew (and eventually died out), and specific challenges to Montessori Education in Taiwan.
Matt Bronsil grew up in Montessori and is the son of Beth and Ken Bronsil, both of whom helped start the Montessori movement in Taiwan